Mees Rottgering vs Saba George Nanobashvili Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Rottgering vs S. George Nanobashvili

Mees Rottgering

NED

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

628

C. Rank

612

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$3.8K

Career Money

Plays

Saba George Nanobashvili

SWE

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

628

C. Rank

612

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$3.8K

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Rottgering 1 - 0 Nanobashvili

They have played 2 sets in total, with Mees Rottgering winning 2 and Saba George Nanobashvili winning 0. The last match between Mees Rottgering and Saba George Nanobashvili was at the M25 Falun, 23-09-2024, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Mees Rottgering getting the victory 6-4 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Rottgering	1
Nanobashvili	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) M25 Falun(09-23-24)

Stats

Mees Rottgering

Saba George Nanobashvili

M. Rottgering vs S. G. Nanobashvili H2H Profile

M. Rottgering	Stats	S. G. Nanobashvili
$3,795	Career Prize Money	$0
53.19% (50-44)	Career Total W/L	47.37% (36-40)
1	Indoor	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0.00% (0-1)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Rottgering vs S. G. Nanobashvili Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mees Rottgering has won 42.65% of points on their second serve, while Saba George Nanobashvili has won 37.90%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mees Rottgering, in recent form, has won 45.67% of their opponent's second serve points, while Saba George Nanobashvili has won 49.07%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.15% and 30.80% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Mees Rottgering has saved 44.22% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Saba George Nanobashvili has saved 48.81% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Mees Rottgering has won 50.00% of matches played (W/L 25/25), with Saba George Nanobashvili winning 44.44% (W/L 12/15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Mees Rottgering has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 7/6), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/1). Saba George Nanobashvili has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 19/15), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 11/20).
Player level: In the last year, Mees Rottgering has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.88% of matches (W/L 19/15), where as Saba George Nanobashvili has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 12/15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mees Rottgering winning 1 times and Saba George Nanobashvili being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mees Rottgering winning 2 and Saba George Nanobashvili winning 0.
The last match between Mees Rottgering and Saba George Nanobashvili was at the M25 Falun, 23-09-2024, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Mees Rottgering getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:5:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mees Rottgering has played against opponents with an average rank of 406.1 while Saba George Nanobashvili has played against players with an average rank of 41.81.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mees Rottgering has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Saba George Nanobashvili has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Mees Rottgering has converted 31.63% of breakpoint opportunities, and Saba George Nanobashvili has converted 36.73% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Mees Rottgering vs Saba George Nanobashvili Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Rottgering vs S. G. Nanobashvili H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Rottgering	Stats	S. G. Nanobashvili
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	5
4	Aces (Total)	3
4	Total Double Faults	2
1:5:0	Average Match Time	1:5:0
54% (25/46)	1st Serve %	52% (33/64)
72% (18/25)	1st Serve Win %	48% (16/33)
62% (13/21)	2nd Serve Win %	45% (14/31)
56% (5/9)	Break Pts Won %	100% (1/1)
53% (34/64)	Return Points Win %	33% (15/46)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Rottgering Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Brisbane 3 Challenger - 10-11-2025
R2 Jake DelaneyJ. Delaney	L	6-7(2) 6-3 3-2 ret.	Stats
R1 Blaise BicknellB. Bicknell	W	6-3 6-1	Stats
M25 Brisbane - 27-10-2025
R2 Matthew DellavedovaM. Dellavedova	L	2-6 6-3 6-2	Stats
R1 Daniel JovanovskiD. Jovanovski	W	3-6 6-4 6-4	Stats
Hersonissos 5 Challenger - 06-10-2025
R1 Toby SamuelT. Samuel	L	6-3 6-1	Stats

View All

S. G. Nanobashvili Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
M25 Hradec Kralove - 24-11-2025
R1 Richard AntoniR. Antoni	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
Q3 Richard AntoniR. Antoni	W	6-2 6-3	Stats
Q1 Simon SmejkalS. Smejkal	W	6-4 6-1	Stats
M25 Monastir - 13-10-2025
Q2 Jay Johnson-HauldrenJ. Johnson-Hauldren	L	6-2 6-0	Stats
Q1 Gabriele Maria PianoG. Maria	W	6-7(8) 6-1 10-1	Stats

View All

M. Rottgering vs S. G. Nanobashvili Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Rottgering	Stats	S. G. Nanobashvili
53.19% (50/44)	YTD Win/Loss	47.37% (36/40)
54.11% (112/95)	Sets Win/Loss	47.06% (80/90)
51.23% (999/951)	Games Win/Loss	48.94% (805/840)
53.49% (23/20)	Hard Win/Loss	55.88% (19/15)
52.78% (19/17)	Clay Win/Loss	35.48% (11/20)
53.85% (7/6)	Indoor Hard W/L	54.55% (6/5)
50.00% (1/1)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
0.22	Aces Per Game	0.11
209	Aces Total	90
0.31	Double Faults Per Game	0.25
297	Total Double Faults	202
1:38:26	Average Match Time	1st Match
409.22	Average Opponent Rank	120.96
59% (3509/5979)	1st Serve %	59% (1651/2815)
67% (2351/3509)	1st Serve Win %	62% (1018/1651)
49% (1220/2470)	2nd Serve Win %	41% (483/1164)
46% (272/591)	Break Points Won % (Total)	49% (134/273)
41% (2486/6019)	Return Points Win %	43% (1114/2616)
33.33% (1/2)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
35.71% (5/9)	Challenger W/L	0% (0/0)
57.14% (44/33)	Futures W/L	47.37% (36/40)
54% (48/89)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	48% (36/75)
0% (0/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
64% (18/28)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	47% (7/15)
41% (9/22)	Deciding Set Win %	58% (11/19)
86% (51/44)	1st Set Won, Won Match	81% (37/30)
14% (51/7)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	19% (37/7)
14% (43/6)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	15% (39/6)